Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective review reveals significant gaps in cancer screening among refugees and immigrants, suggesting intervention opportunities.
Background Cancer screening rates in refugee and immigrant populations are lower than the U.S.-born population. Interventions to ameliorate the disparity in cancer screening are needed. Methods A retrospective review of N = 1083 patient charts was conducted to evaluate cancer screening rates for refugees and immigrants at an academic adult medicine clinic from June to December 2021. Language was used as a proxy for foreign-born status and a complete review of the electronic medical record conducted by a trained clinical team confirmed immigrant status and determined up-to-date cancer screening status. Descriptive statistics examined demographic factors and whether screenings for cervical, breast, colon, lung, and hepatocellular cancer were up-to-date with nationally accepted guidelines. Results Among eligible women, 63.0% of participants were up to date on cervical cancer screening, and 71.4% were up to date on breast cancer screening. 52.4% of those eligible for colon cancer screening, 23.1% of those eligible for lung cancer screening, and 25.0% of those eligible for hepatocellular cancer screening were up to date based on recommended screening guidelines. Discussion The purpose of this study is to present baseline data from a non-English speaking refugee and immigrant primary care population at an academic medical institution. Identifying the gaps in cancer screening provides an opportunity to design meaningful clinic and community-based interventions for providers and health systems to improve health equity for patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thompson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: