Retrospective nested case-control study evaluates AI-based non-invasive cancer screening in dialysis patients, highlighting critical predictive factors.
Standard cancer screening guidelines are often suboptimal for patients on maintenance dialysis due to limited life expectancy and the reduced diagnostic accuracy of conventional tumor markers. Given the disproportionately high cancer incidence in this population, there is an urgent need for specialized, non-invasive screening modalities. This study explores the potential of combining bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) with artificial intelligence (AI) to identify malignant signatures in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. This retrospective nested case-control study analyzed 329 PD patients (9.4% with cancer). Multi-frequency BIS parameters and clinical features were utilized to train four machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, random forest, SVM, and logistic regression). To prevent information leakage, recursive feature elimination and synthetic minority over-sampling technique were strictly embedded within a 10-fold repeated stratified train-test split validation framework. Model interpretability was evaluated using the SHapley Additive exPlanations framework. The XGBoost model outperformed the other algorithms, delivering a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.759 ± 0.071, an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.379 ± 0.120, and a high negative predictive value of 0.970 ± 0.021. Subgroup analysis showed the highest detection rate for urinary system cancers (80.0%). C-reactive protein and overhydration emerged as the most critical predictors, demonstrating a distinct synergistic interaction effect. Misclassification analysis revealed that the model was particularly adept at capturing a cancer-driven systemic inflammatory and cachectic phenotype. This work establishes a non-invasive, explainable AI framework that enables opportunistic multi-cancer screening within routine PD workflows. By decoding the hidden biophysical synergy between systemic inflammation and fluid dynamics, the model serves as an efficient clinical sentinel to rule out non-cancer instances and identify aggressive malignancies without added diagnostic burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: