Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates control safety in anti-lock braking systems using neural controllers, highlighting feasibility for ISO 26262 certification.
We present a compositional formal verification framework that establishes floating-point correctness and control safety for anti-lock braking system (ABS) neural controllers, using Rocq and Flocq as a single verification toolchain. We decompose the verification into three independent components. First, a Flocq proof bounds each binary32 operation to machine epsilon. Second, a CoqInterval-verified barrier certificate enforces eight pointwise conditions across four road surfaces, keeping the slip ratio within [0.03,0.40]. Third, an ODE forward invariance lemma lifts these pointwise conditions to a temporal guarantee via the suprema axiom and ε-δ continuity arguments. The compositional theorem combines all three layers into an end-to-end safety proof. Our Rocq development (866 lines, 7 modules) compiles successfully: the core floating-point lemmas are Qed, with one lemma remaining Admitted. Numerical simulation across four road surfaces (after 0.3 s settling, v≥1.5 m/s) shows that the neural network controller achieves 100% closed-loop safety on every surface, including ice, outperforming the classical finite state machine controller (96.0–100%). The framework demonstrates that single-toolchain compositional verification of floating-point neural controllers is feasible, directly supporting ISO 26262 certification for safety-critical automotive systems. The verified barrier windows and open-source Rocq artifacts provide a reusable foundation for future neural ABS verification work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huixing Fang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: