Demonstrates improved temperature prediction in co-doped nanoparticles, suggesting a new approach to luminescence thermometry.
In this manuscript, we redefine the operational limits of Yb 3+ ‐based near‐infrared luminescence thermometry. Using Ce 3+ /Yb 3+ co‐doped Y 3 Al 5 O 12 (YAG) nanoparticles, we established a full‐spectrum, data‐driven thermometric framework that transcends the constraints of the conventional Boltzmann‐based luminescence intensity ratio method. By systematically optimizing Yb 3+ concentration and leveraging both unsupervised (Principal Component Analysis) and supervised (Random Forest and Gaussian Process Regression) machine learning approaches, we extracted robust, temperature‐encoded signatures from highly overlapped Yb 3+ Stark‐level emissions. This approach enables accurate, full‐spectrum thermometry across the entire 100–700 K range, far surpassing the conventional Boltzmann limit (> 420 K). Gaussian Process Regression yields an exceptional peak performance with an average accuracy of 0.02 K and a precision of 0.11 K. Furthermore, when subjected to a rigorous temperature‐block splitting strategy to evaluate genuine generalization, the framework retains sub‐kelvin predictive power, demonstrating an absolute accuracy of 0.45 K and a precision of 0.13 K, outperforming all conventional and alternative machine learning methods under disjoint conditions. Beyond the demonstrated performance in Ce 3+ /Yb 3+ ‐doped YAG, these results establish Luminescence Thermometry 2.0 as a full‐spectrum, data‐driven thermometric framework in which spectral complexity is exploited rather than avoided, and in which temperature prediction is evaluated through both precision and genuine predictive generalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Periša et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: