Purpose This paper aims to provide a personal perspective on the extent to which business schools have globalized what they teach and to make content‐ and process‐related suggestions about how to make further progress. Design/methodology/approach The paper provides a mixture of quantitative and qualitative/interpretative analysis. Findings The paper finds that rhetoric around the globalization of business education has greatly outrun the reality of curricular change and this problem seems unlikely to be solved until the craving for distinctively global content can be satisfied. Research limitations/implications Semiglobalization – the intermediate state of integration in which neither the bridges nor the borders between countries can be ignored – is proposed as a conceptual umbrella for organizing curricular change and in terms, of process, a two‐track‐approach, combining infusion and insertion, is recommended. Originality/value Both the conceptual and procedural recommendations of this paper are novel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pankaj Ghemawat (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: