Key result
Specific lesion locations link to functional mobility and cognitive recovery patterns after stroke.
Observational
PURPOSE: We examined the hypotheses that a comprehensive method for categorizing specific brain regions impaired by stroke is feasible and that this method may be used to explore associations between specific impaired brain regions and functional outcomes. METHOD: Impaired brain regions were identified with neuroanatomical diagrams. Body function outcomes (motor, somatosensory, and cognition) were measured with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and activity outcomes (functional mobility, self-care, and instrumental activities of daily living) were measured with the Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills. Decision analyses identified brain regions associated with functional outcomes and the influence of ischemia on outcome scores. RESULTS: Motor control and somatosensation brain regions were linked with motor and somatosensory outcomes; those associated with decision making and motor planning were linked with cognition and functional mobility outcomes. Data were insufficiently powered to examine brain regions associated with self-care and instrumental activities of daily living outcomes. CONCLUSION: The findings support the feasibility of study methods. Further investigation with larger, well-defined samples is warranted using study methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skidmore et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Stroke. Categorization of impaired brain regions using neuroanatomical diagrams was evaluated on Body function outcomes (motor, somatosensory, and cognition via NIHSS) and activity outcomes (functional mobility, self-care, and IADL via Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills). Neuroanatomical diagram categorization linked motor control, somatosensation, and motor planning brain regions to motor, somatosensory, cognition, and functional mobility outcomes after stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: