Why the study?
Do novel oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Do novel oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
This review provides a clinical perspective on the efficacy, safety, and practical management of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Offers practical NOAC guidance for NVAF stroke prevention; leaves open need for updated comparative trials in real-world cohorts.
Over the past few years, three novel oral anticoagulants, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, have been approved in the USA and Europe to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and the results of a Phase III trial for a fourth novel oral anticoagulant, edoxaban, have recently been published. The aim of this review is to examine this indication from a clinician's perspective, highlighting efficacy and safety results from the major trials with these novel oral agents. Clinical issues regarding bleeding, monitoring, and reversal are discussed, along with requirements to consider when interrupting treatment with a novel oral anticoagulant for the purpose of transitioning to another anticoagulant and prior to cardioversion, ablation, percutaneous coronary intervention, or emergency surgery. The cost-effectiveness of each of the approved novel oral anticoagulants is reviewed, and the author provides recommendations for selecting appropriate patients for these agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eugene Yang (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: