Why the study?
Does a Gaussian functions-based model of P-wave morphology improve the identification of patients at risk of developing atrial fibrillation compared to classical time-domain parameters?
Does a Gaussian functions-based model of P-wave morphology improve the identification of patients at risk of developing atrial fibrillation compared to classical time-domain parameters?
A novel Gaussian function-based model for P-wave morphology assessment may improve risk stratification for atrial fibrillation in patients with pacemakers.
May aid AF risk stratification in pacemaker patients; leaves open prospective validation versus classical parameters.
Aim of this study was to present a P-wave model, based on a linear combination of Gaussian functions, to quantify morphological aspects of P-wave in patients prone to atrial fibrillation (AF). Five-minute ECG recordings were performed in 25 patients with permanent dual chamber pacemakers. Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups, including patients with and without AF episodes in the last 6 mo preceding the study, respectively. ECG signals were acquired using a 32-lead mapping system for high-resolution biopotential measurement (ActiveTwo, Biosemi, The Netherlands, sample frequency 2 kHz, 24-bit resolution). Up to 8 Gaussian models have been computed for each averaged P-wave extracted from every lead. The P-wave morphology was evaluated by extracting seven parameters. Classical time-domain parameters, based on P-wave duration estimation, have been also estimated. We found that the P-wave morphology can be effectively modeled by a linear combination of Gaussian functions. In addition, the combination of time-domain and morphological parameters extracted from the Gaussian function-based model of the P-wave improves the identification of patients having different risks of developing AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Censi et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: