Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, we measured the effects of sample type and storage temperature on the stability of 29 per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in water. Spiked bottled water, surface water, and two types of effluent samples were stored in HDPE containers at +20, 4, and −20 °C over a period of up to 180 days. The analytes studied included C 4 through C 14 perfluorinated carboxylates (PFCAs); C 4 through C 10 and C 12 perfluorinated sulfonates (PFSAs); 4:2, 6:2, and 8:2 fluorotelomer sulfonates (FTS); three perfluorooctane sulfonamides (PFOSA, N-MeFOSA, and N-EtFOSA); two perfluorooctane sulfonamide ethanols (N-MeFOSE and N-EtFOSE); and two perfluorooctane sulfonamide acetic acids (N-MeFOSAA and EtFOSAA). Overall, 10 analytes, PFOA, PFNA, 8:2 FTS, PFOSA, N-MeFOSA, NEtFOSA, N-MeFOSAA, N-EtFOSAA, N-MeFOSE, and N-EtFOSE, showed increasing or decreasing concentration trends under at least one of the experimental conditions investigated. Increases in concentrations of N-MeFOSAA and N-EtFOSAA in surface water and effluent samples at +20 and 4 °C correlated with the decreases in the concentrations of N-MeFOSE and N-EtFOSE, respectively, suggesting analyte interconversion during sample storage. This is the first time such analyte conversion is reported in samples under storage, and this work demonstrates the importance of assessing stability of PFAS in environmentally relevant matrices. The significance of this study extends beyond sample storage for analysis, as toxicological and exposure studies conducted at room temperature also need to consider the significance of analyte degradation through the exposure process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woudneh et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: