Objectives To develop a clinically applicable predictive model to quantitate the risk of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline to ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 after radical nephrectomy (RN) to better inform decisions between RN and partial nephrectomy (PN). Patients and Methods Our prospectively maintained kidney cancer registry was reviewed for patients with a preoperative eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 who underwent RN for a localized renal mass. New baseline renal function was indexed. We used multivariable logistic regression to develop a predictive nomogram and evaluated it using receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Decision‐curve analysis was used to assess the net clinical benefit. Results A total of 668 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 183 (27%) experienced a decline in eGFR to ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . On multivariable analysis, increasing age ( P = 0.001), female gender ( P < 0.001), and increasing preoperative creatinine level ( P < 0.001) were associated with functional decline. We constructed a predictive nomogram that included these variables in addition to comorbidities with a known association with kidney disease, but found that a simplified model excluding comorbidities was equally robust (cross‐validated area under the ROC curve was 0.78). Decision‐curve analysis showed the net clinical benefit at probabilities >~11%. Conclusions The decision to perform RN vs PN is multifaceted. We have provided a simple quantitative tool to help identify patients at risk of a postoperative eGFR of ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , who may be stronger candidates for nephron preservation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McIntosh et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: