Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
From a sample of 72 galaxies with reliable supermassive black hole masses M bh , we derive the M bh –(host spheroid luminosity, L ) relation for (1) the subsample of 24 core-Sérsic galaxies with partially depleted cores, and (2) the remaining subsample of 48 Sérsic galaxies. Using K s -band Two Micron All Sky Survey data, we find the near-linear relation M bh ∝ L 1.10 ± 0.20 K s for the core-Sérsic spheroids thought to be built in additive dry merger events, while we find the relation M bh ∝ L 2.73 ± 0.55 K s for the Sérsic spheroids built from gas-rich processes. After converting literature B -band disk galaxy magnitudes into inclination- and dust-corrected bulge magnitudes, via a useful new equation presented herein, we obtain a similar result. Unlike with the M bh –(velocity dispersion) diagram, which is also updated here using the same galaxy sample, it remains unknown whether barred and non-barred Sérsic galaxies are offset from each other in the M bh – L diagram. While black hole feedback has typically been invoked to explain what was previously thought to be a nearly constant M bh / M Spheroid mass ratio of ∼0.2%, we advocate that the near-linear M bh – L and M bh – M Spheroid relations observed at high masses may have instead arisen largely from the additive dry merging of galaxies. We argue that feedback results in a dramatically different scaling relation, such that black hole mass scales roughly quadratically with the spheroid mass in Sérsic galaxies. We therefore introduce a revised cold-gas "quasar" mode feeding equation for semi-analytical models to reflect what we dub the quadratic growth of black holes in Sérsic galaxies built amidst gas-rich processes. Finally, we use our new Sérsic M bh – L equations to predict the masses of candidate intermediate mass black holes in almost 50 low-luminosity spheroids containing active galactic nuclei, finding many masses between that of stellar mass black holes and supermassive black holes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: