Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This commentary uses a geographical approach to make three points about the multiscalar distribution of risk and opportunity associated with ‘debt-trap diplomacy’ in the context of China–Africa relations. First, although geopolitical narratives are often inaccurate, they affect geopolitical perceptions and, in turn, the distribution of debt-related risk. Second, just as geopolitical dynamics affect domestic politics, domestic political dynamics influence the geopolitics of debt. Finally, the use of debt as a geopolitical tool is not limited to lenders or governments. A variety of actors – from opposition parties to media outlets – can deploy debt to recalibrate power relations across states as well as within them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meredith J. DeBoom (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: