Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Postoperative results and complications in 136 eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome were compared to 744 eyes without pseudoexfoliation syndrome in a consecutive study. The patients were followed for 4 months postoperatively. Excluding cases with glaucoma, 81.4% of the pseudoexfoliation eyes and 83.0% of the eyes without pseudoexfoliation achieved a corrected visual acuity of 5/8.5 or better. IOL malposition was rare in both groups (1.5% in the pseudoexfoliation group and 1.6% in the group without pseudoexfoliation). IOP elevation the first day postoperatively occurred most often in the pseudoexfoliation eyes. In the pseudoexfoliation eyes, postoperative iritis and cellular precipitates were demonstrated in 16.2% and 11.0%, respectively, compared to 3.8% and 3.2% in the eyes without pseudoexfoliation (p < 0.001). The frequency of an inflammatory reaction was highly correlated to small pupil size during operation in both groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drolsum et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: