Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this work, the dye-sensitization approach was used to optimize the compact layer/perovskite interface in planar perovskite solar cells (PSCs). The chemisorption of the triphenylamine-based metal-free organic (E)-3-(5-(4-(bis(2′,4′-dibutoxy-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4yl)amino)phenyl)thiophen-2-yl)-2-cyanoacrylic acid (D35) sensitizer via a bidentate anchor group on the titania surface resulted in both enhanced electron transfer and controlled growth of the top MAPbI 3 perovskite layer. This modification led to planar PSC devices presenting significantly improved performance and increased stability. Using the Spiro-OMeTAD molecular hole conductor, stabilized output power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of 13% were obtained for cells with titania sensitization, clearly outperforming those of cells without D35. This investigation gives new insights into how the molecular engineering via dye sensitization of the functional interfaces affects the performance in PSCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balis et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: