Key result
Co-administering fimasartan and linagliptin causes no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction.
Why the study?
Fimasartan and linagliptin are frequently coadministered to treat hypertension and diabetes, but their pharmacokinetic interactions needed evaluation.
Does concomitant administration of fimasartan and linagliptin alter the steady-state pharmacokinetics or safety profile of either drug compared with monotherapy in healthy male volunteers?
RCT (n=37)
Open-label
Randomized into Part A or Part B in the order of enrollment (two-period, single-sequence per part)
No
Does concomitant administration of fimasartan and linagliptin alter the steady-state pharmacokinetics or safety profile of either drug compared with monotherapy in healthy male volunteers?
Co-administration of fimasartan and linagliptin is well tolerated and produces no clinically meaningful pharmacokinetic interactions, supporting their concomitant use in patients with coexisting hypertension and type 2 diabetes.
Supports co-administration without dose adjustment in hypertension with T2D; confirms no clinically significant interactions in this RCT.
Objective: Fimasartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, and linagliptin, a dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor, are frequently coadministered to treat patients with hypertension and diabetes, respectively. This study sought to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions between fimasartan and linagliptin after co-administration in healthy Korean subjects. Methods: The overall study was divided into two separate parts, with each part designed as an open-label, multiple-dose, two-period, and single-sequence study. In Part A, to investigate the effect of linagliptin on fimasartan, 25 subjects received 120 mg fimasartan alone once daily for seven days during Period I, and 120 mg fimasartan with 20 mg linagliptin for seven days during Period II. In Part B, to examine the effect of fimasartan on linagliptin, 12 subjects received only linagliptin once daily for seven days during Period I, followed by concomitant administration of fimasartan for seven days during Period II, at the same doses used in Part A. Serial blood samples were collected at scheduled intervals for up to 24 h after the last dose to determine the steady-state pharmacokinetics of both drugs. Results: Thirty-six subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals for maximum plasma concentration at steady state (C max,ss ) and area under the concentration–time curve at steady state (AUC τ,ss ) of fimasartan with or without linagliptin were 1.2633 (0.9175– 1.7396) and 1.1740 (1.0499– 1.3126), respectively. The corresponding values for C max,ss and AUC τ,ss of linagliptin with or without fimasartan were 0.9804 (0.8480– 1.1336) and 0.9950 (0.9322– 1.0619), respectively. A total of eight adverse events (AEs) were reported and the incidence of AEs did not increase significantly with co-administration of the drugs. Conclusion: Our results suggest that there are no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between fimasartan and linagliptin when co-administered. Treatments were well tolerated during the study, with no serious adverse effects. Clinical Trial Registry: http://clinicaltrials.gov , NCT03250052.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (evaluating drug-drug interaction for hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus therapies) (n=37). Concomitant fimasartan and linagliptin vs. Monotherapy with fimasartan 120 mg once daily (Part A) or linagliptin 5 mg once daily (Part B) was evaluated on Steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters (AUCτ,ss and Cmax,ss) of fimasartan and linagliptin (GMR 1.1740 for fimasartan AUCτ,ss; GMR 0.9950 for linagliptin AUCτ,ss, 95% CI 1.0499-1.3126 (90% CI for fimasartan AUCτ,ss), p=0.0497). Co-administration of fimasartan and linagliptin resulted in no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions (fimasartan AUCτ,ss GMR 1.17, linagliptin AUCτ,ss GMR 1.00) in healthy volunteers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: