Key result
The cumulative I-index (c-I-index) was significantly higher in patients with surgical site infection compared to controls (113.6 vs 32.6, p<0.0001), with an optimal cutoff of 45.95 yielding 82.4% sensitivity and 80.4% specificity.
Why the study?
Patients with prolonged and intense neutrophilia after spinal surgery are at high risk for surgical site infection, but no standard method exists to objectively assess its intensity and duration.
Does the I-index derived from the postoperative neutrophil curve predict surgical site infection in patients after spinal surgery?
Case-Control (n=68)
No
Does the I-index derived from the postoperative neutrophil curve predict surgical site infection in patients after spinal surgery?
The I-index, derived from the area under the postoperative neutrophil curve, is a useful and simple predictor for the early detection of surgical site infection after spinal surgery.
May aid postoperative SSI risk stratification after spinal surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Patients with prolonged and intense neutrophilia after spinal surgery are at high risk of developing surgical site infection (SSI). To date, there is no standard method for the objective assessment of the intensity and duration of neutrophilia. Thus, this retrospective observational study aimed to test a new index (I-index), developed by combining the duration and intensity of neutrophilia, as a predictor of SSI. METHODS: I-index was calculated based on the postoperative neutrophil percentage. A total of 17 patients with SSI were enrolled as cases, and 51 patients without SSI were selected as controls. The groups were matched at a ratio of 1:3 by age, sex, and surgery type. The differences in the I-index were compared between the groups. Moreover, we checked the cumulative I-index (c-I-index), which we defined as the area under the neutrophil curve from postoperative day 1 until the first clinical manifestation of SSI in each case. Furthermore, a cutoff for SSI was defined using the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The median I-index-7, I-index-14, and c-I-index were significantly higher in the SSI group than those in the control group. For a cutoff point of 42.1 of the I-index-7, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.706 and 0.882, respectively. For a cutoff point of 45.95 of the I-index-14, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.824 and 0.804, respectively. For a cutoff point of 45.95 of the c-I-index, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.824 and 0.804, respectively. CONCLUSION: We devised a new indicator of infection, i.e., the I-Index and c-I-index, and confirmed its usefulness in predicting SSI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inose et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Surgical site infection after spinal surgery (n=68). I-index (area under the neutrophil curve) vs. Matched controls without surgical site infection was evaluated on Cumulative I-index (c-I-index) (p=<0.0001). The cumulative I-index (c-I-index) was significantly higher in patients with surgical site infection compared to controls (113.6 vs 32.6, p<0.0001), with an optimal cutoff of 45.95 yielding 82.4% sensitivity and 80.4% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: