Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a mathematical review of methods and algorithms used to compute milling cutter placement for multi-axis finished-surface machining. In general, these methods and algorithms compute tool path points based on tangent-plane contact between the milling cutter and the surface while maintaining a fixed tool orientation. This tangent-plane method of tool positioning and orientation is examined by discussing its strengths and weaknesses. Errors resulting from the tangent-plane approach are typically determined using a posteriori cutter path checking and graphic visualization techniques. Although these checking techniques have proved useful in identifying the tool path errors before actual machining, the problem of generating an error-free tool path remains. In this paper, we discuss the analysis of tool path position and orientation data as they are generated. This a priori analysis method is used to show error locations along the lateral face of the tool. The conclusion is reached that additional research is needed in the area of simultaneous multi-axis tool path planning, if errors are to be eliminated and the efficiency of the milling machine is to be improved. The reader is referred to research efforts that extend beyond the traditional or computer-aided design (CAD, vendor supplied) tool path planning methods. Some of these efforts show great promise in eliminating gouging and improves machine tool efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: