This study examines the anti-war movement’s conflicted attitude toward the Arab-Israeli conflict in the late 1960s and early 1970s. It details how these uncertainties highlighted and exacerbated several fault lines, including between those advocating the single-issue approach versus those wishing to expand the movement’s focus beyond Vietnam, and between anti-imperialists who denounced Israel versus others who supported it. This friction over the Middle East was a microcosm of much deeper tensions that bedeviled and weakened the entire liberal-to-left-wing spectrum of American politics, and its examination reveals much about the weaknesses and struggles facing progressives five decades ago and even today.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael R. Fischbach (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: