Key result
Copeptin did not significantly improve the diagnostic performance for detecting myocardial infarction when added to a contemporary sensitive cardiac troponin I assay (AUC 0.95 vs 0.96).
Why the study?
Does adding copeptin to troponin improve the diagnostic performance for detecting myocardial infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute nontraumatic chest pain?
Observational
Does adding copeptin to troponin improve the diagnostic performance for detecting myocardial infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute nontraumatic chest pain?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.95% vs 0.96%
The addition of copeptin to contemporary troponin assays does not yield incremental diagnostic value for acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with chest pain.
Copeptin adds no diagnostic value to contemporary troponin; leaves open utility with older assays or in targeted subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Arginine-vasopressin (AVP) is an acute marker of physiologic stress. Copeptin is the C-terminal fragment of vasopressin precursor hormone that is more easily measured than AVP. Studies assessing the utility of copeptin in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) have demonstrated mixed results. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that copeptin improves diagnostic performance when added to troponin for detecting MI in patients presenting to the emergency department with nontraumatic chest pain. METHODS: We measured copeptin, local cardiac troponin I (local cTnI), and a contemporary sensitive cardiac troponin I (sensitive cTnI) at presentation and serially in patients who presented with acute chest pain. A copeptin cutoff of 14 pmol/L was utilized. RESULTS: MI was diagnosed in 25.7% of patients. Noncoronary acute cardiopulmonary causes of chest pain occurred in 12.8%. Patients with MI had significantly higher copeptin levels than patients with noncardiac chest pain (P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for copeptin was 0.60 (95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.66), significantly less than the AUC for local cTnI (0.92) or sensitive cTnI (0.96). The combination of copeptin with either the local or sensitive troponin assay (c-statistics 0.92 and 0.95, respectively) did not significantly improve the AUC as compared to either troponin assay alone. This finding persisted in the subgroup of early presenters (≤ 6 hours from symptom onset). CONCLUSIONS: Copeptin did not improve the diagnostic performance for detecting MI when used alone or in combination with a contemporary sensitive cTnI assay, though our cohort had relatively few early presenters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sukul et al. (2014) conducted an observational in acute nontraumatic chest pain. Copeptin combined with cardiac troponin vs. Cardiac troponin alone was evaluated on Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for detecting myocardial infarction. Copeptin did not significantly improve the diagnostic performance for detecting myocardial infarction when added to a contemporary sensitive cardiac troponin I assay (AUC 0.95 vs 0.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: