Key result
Ground-level 30% body weight support reduces walking speed and lower-limb range of motion after stroke.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Body weight support (BWS) systems on treadmill have been proposed as a strategy for gait training of subjects with stroke. Considering that ground level is the most common locomotion surface and that there is little information about individuals with stroke walking with BWS on ground level, it is important to investigate the use of BWS on ground level in these individuals as a possible alternative strategy for gait training. METHODS: Thirteen individuals with chronic stroke (four women and nine men; mean age 54.46 years) were videotaped walking on ground level in three experimental conditions: with no harness, with harness bearing full body weight, and with harness bearing 30% of full body weight. Measurements were recorded for mean walking speed, cadence, stride length, stride speed, durations of initial and terminal double stance, single limb support, swing period, and range of motion of ankle, knee, and hip joints; and foot, shank, thigh, and trunk segments. RESULTS: The use of BWS system leads to changes in stride length and speed, but not in stance and swing period duration. Only the hip joint was influenced by the BWS system in the 30% BWS condition. Shank and thigh segments presented less range of motion in the 30% BWS condition than in the other conditions, and the trunk was held straighter in the 30% BWS condition than in the other conditions. CONCLUSION: Individuals with stroke using BWS system on ground level walked slower and with shorter stride length than with no harness. BWS also led to reduction of hip, shank, and thigh range of motion. However, this system did not change walking temporal organization and body side asymmetry of individuals with stroke. On the other hand, the BWS system enabled individuals with chronic stroke to walk safely and without physical assistance. In interventions, the physical therapist can watch and correct gait pattern in patients' performance without the need to provide physical assistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sousa et al. (2009) studied Chronic stroke (n=13). Body weight support (BWS) system on ground level vs. Walking with no harness was evaluated on Gait spatiotemporal parameters (walking speed, cadence, stride length, stance/swing durations) and joint/segment range of motion. Ground-level 30% body weight support reduced walking speed, stride length, and hip/thigh/shank range of motion in 13 chronic stroke patients without altering temporal gait organization.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: