In this paper we give a new proof of Hopf's boundary point lemma for the fractional Laplacian. With respect to the classical formulation, in the non-local framework the normal derivative of the involved function~u at~z ∈ ∂ Ω is replaced with the limit of the ratio u(x)/(δR(x))ˢ, where δR(x)= dist(x, ∂ BR) and BR ⊂ Ω is a ball such that z ∈ ∂ BR. Also we consider an overdetermined problem and we prove the that it admits a solution only in a suitable ball centered at the origin. The proof is based on a comparison principle proved along the paper, and on the boundary point lemma mentioned before.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greco et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: