Key result
A 10-variable clinical risk tool identified patients with stable chest pain at minimal risk for clinical events (C statistic 0.725), with severely abnormal test results occurring in 1.3% for CCTA and 5.6% for functional testing.
Why the study?
Can a clinical risk tool using pretest variables identify patients with stable chest pain who have normal coronary arteries and no clinical events?
Population
4,631 stable, symptomatic outpatients without known coronary artery disease referred for noninvasive testing…
Design
Cohort, randomized (original trial)
Follow-up
median 25 months
Authors
Loading...
May support deferral of testing in minimal-risk stable chest pain; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
RCT (n=4,631)
randomized
Yes
Can a clinical risk tool using pretest variables identify patients with stable chest pain who have normal coronary arteries and no clinical events?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.3% vs 5.6%
A clinical tool using 10 pretest variables can identify over 25% of stable chest pain patients who have minimal risk of abnormal test results or clinical events, for whom deferred testing may be considered.
Fordyce et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in stable chest pain (n=4,631). Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs. Functional testing was evaluated on severely abnormal test results among patients at highest probability of minimal risk. A 10-variable clinical risk tool identified patients with stable chest pain at minimal risk for clinical events (C statistic 0.725), with severely abnormal test results occurring in 1.3% for CCTA and 5.6% for functional testing.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: