Why the study?
Does left partial ventriculectomy improve LVEF and hemodynamics in patients with refractory heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does left partial ventriculectomy improve LVEF and hemodynamics in patients with refractory heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Left partial ventriculectomy significantly improves LVEF and hemodynamics in patients with refractory heart failure, though the risk of death remains a concern for clinical application.
Should not change practice; leaves open the role of left partial ventriculectomy in refractory dilated cardiomyopathy.
OBJECTIVE: Left partial ventriculectomy has been proposed for treatment of heart failure. We investigated the effects of isolated left partial ventriculectomy and left partial ventriculectomy associated with mitral annuloplasty on refractory heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Nineteen patients underwent partial left partial ventriculectomy associated with mitral annuloplasty and six patients isolated left partial ventriculectomy. In two patients the left partial ventriculectomy associated with mitral annuloplasty was combined with tricuspid annuloplasty. We evaluated before and after the surgery (24+/-14 days): the functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), right ventricular ejection fraction (EF), regional wall motion, hemodynamics, mitral regurgitation, left ventricular geometry and coronary angiography. RESULTS: For the overall group LVEF improved from 14.5+/-8.0 to 30.3+/-12.2% (P<0.0002) and right ventricular EF from 21.2+/-7.1 to 28.4+/-8.3% (P<0.002). In patients who underwent left partial ventriculectomy associated with mitral annuloplasty LVEF increased from 14.5+/-8.6 to 29.5+/-12.2% (P<0. 002). Isolated left partial ventriculectomy increased LVEF from 13. 5+/-7.5 to 31.5+/-11.1% (P<0.04). Distal segments of marginal branches of the circumflex artery were not visualized by coronary angiography. Left partial ventriculectomy associated with mitral annuloplasty reduced the wedge pressure from 25.0+/-12.1 to 18.0+/-7. 0 mmHg (P<0.03) and increased cardiac output from 3.8+/-0.8 to 4. 6+/-1.1 l/min (P<0.004), while isolated left partial ventriculectomy increased cardiac output from 3.7+/-1.0 to 4.8+/-1.3 l/min (P<0.03). Regional wall motion increment was more evident in anterolateral region from 4.2+/-6.8 to 14+/-8.3% (P<0.002) except in two patients. Left ventricular geometry changed in most patients, but a homogeneous pattern was not identified. Seven patients died during a mean follow-up of 546+/-276 days. Survivors had improvement in functional class. Augmentation of LVEF >5% was associated with a favorable clinical outcome with improvement in clinical status without death. CONCLUSIONS: Effects of left partial ventriculectomy are not necessarily dependent upon reduction of mitral regurgitation or changes in left ventricular geometry. However, risk of death after the surgery must be reduced for a clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bocchi et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: