Key result
Carbon pencil lead electrodes provided better ECG waveform quality and less distortion compared to Ag/AgCl electrodes during water immersion with movement in a hot spring.
Why the study?
When monitoring ECG in a hot spring, commercial Ag/AgCl electrodes require time-consuming waterproofing and adhesive removal may tear the skin.
Do carbon pencil lead (CPL) electrodes improve ECG signal quality compared to Ag/AgCl electrodes in subjects immersed in hot spring water?
Do carbon pencil lead (CPL) electrodes improve ECG signal quality compared to Ag/AgCl electrodes in subjects immersed in hot spring water?
Carbon pencil lead electrodes provide superior ECG signal stability and less waveform distortion compared to standard Ag/AgCl electrodes during hot spring water immersion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support carbon electrodes for ECG in aquatic settings; leaves open clinical validation before adoption.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) electrodes are conductive pads applied to the skin to measure cardiac activity. Ag/AgCl electrodes are the commercial product which widely used to obtain ECGs. When monitoring the ECG in a hot spring, Ag/AgCl electrodes must be waterproofed; however, this is time-consuming, and the adhesive may tear the skin on removal. For solving the problem, we developed the carbon pencil lead (CPL) electrodes for use in hot springs. Both CPL and Ag/AgCl electrodes were connected to ECG100C’s cables. The Performance was evaluated in three conditions as following: hot spring water with and without bubble, and in cold water. In each environment, the procedure was followed by three different protocols that are recording from the dry condition, hot spring water immersion with and without movement, post hot spring water condition. Under dry and wet conditions, both electrodes can obtain the waveform of the ECG signal in which all PQRST waves were identifiable. Nevertheless, the signal quality of both types of electrodes was different in water immersion with and without movement. The overall morphology obtained by Ag/AgCl electrodes was unstable higher than that of CPL electrodes in immersion without movement condition. The CPL electrodes provided better ECG waveform quality compared to Ag/AgCl electrodes in which the ECG signal had high waveforms distortion in water immersion with movement condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeu et al. (2020) studied Healthy subjects requiring ECG monitoring. Carbon pencil lead (CPL) electrodes vs. Ag/AgCl electrodes was evaluated on ECG signal quality and waveform distortion. Carbon pencil lead electrodes provided better ECG waveform quality and less distortion compared to Ag/AgCl electrodes during water immersion with movement in a hot spring.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: