Key result
Developing an evidence-based immunization strategy for the EV71 vaccine in China requires considering target age groups, dosing schedules, economic value, and post-marketing surveillance.
An evidence-based immunization strategy for the EV71 vaccine in China must consider target age, dosing, economics, and post-marketing surveillance to optimize impact and safety.
Highlights need for comprehensive EV71 planning in China; leaves open optimal strategies pending targeted studies.
Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a common pathogen for hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), which has significant morbidity and mortality, and for which children aged 6-59 months age are at highest risk. Due to lack of effective treatment options, control of EV71 epidemics has mainly focused on development of EV71 vaccines. Clinical trials have been completed on 3 EV71 vaccines, with trial results demonstrating good vaccine efficacy and safety. When EV71 vaccine is approved by China's national regulatory authority, an evidence-based strategy should be developed to optimize impact and safety. An immunization strategy for EV71 vaccine should consider several factors, including the target population age group, the number of doses for primary immunization, the need for a booster dose, concomitant administration of other vaccines, economic value, program capacity and logistics, and public acceptance. Once EV71 vaccines are in use, vaccine effectiveness and safety must be monitored in large populations, and the epidemiology of HFMD must be evaluated to assure a match between vaccination strategy and epidemiology. Evaluation in China is especially important because there are no other EV71 vaccines globally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2014) conducted a review in Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). EV71 vaccine was evaluated. Developing an evidence-based immunization strategy for the EV71 vaccine in China requires considering target age groups, dosing schedules, economic value, and post-marketing surveillance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: