Key result
Among adults aged 25-64 with acute myocardial infarction, overall 36-month survival did not significantly differ across the 1996, 2003-2004, 2008, and 2012 time periods (p=0.081).
Why the study?
Reliable epidemiological data on long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction in the Lithuanian population were lacking.
Observational
Long-term survival after AMI in Lithuania is significantly better in women and younger patients, with a trend toward decreased mortality risk in younger men over time.
Background and Objective: There is a lack of reliable epidemiological data on the long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the Lithuanian population. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term (36 months) survival after AMI among persons aged 25–64 years, who had experienced AMI in four time-periods 1996, 2003–2004, 2008, and 2012. Material and Methods: The source of the data was Kaunas population-based Ischemic heart disease (IHD) register. Long-term survival after AMI (36 months) was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The survival curves significantly differed when p < 0.05. Hazard ratio for all-cause mortality and their 95% CIs, adjusted for baseline characteristics, were estimated with the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: The analysis of data on 36 months long-term survival among Kaunas population by sex and age groups showed that the survival rates among men and women were 83.4% and 87.6%, respectively (p < 0.05) and among 25–54 years-old and 55–64 years-old persons, 89.2% and 81.7%, respectively (p < 0.05). The rates of long-term survival of post-AMI Kaunas population were better in past periods than in first period. According to the data of the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, long-term survival of 25 to 64-year-old post-AMI Kaunas population was without significantly difference in 1996, 2003–2004, 2008 and 2012 (Log-rank = 6.736, p = 0.081). The adjusted risk of all-cause mortality during 36 months among men and 25 to 54-year-old patients was on the average by 35% and 60% lower in 2012 than in 1996, respectively. Conclusion: It was found that 36 months survival post MI among women and younger (25–54 years) persons was significant better compared to men and older (55–64 years) persons. Long-term survival among 55 to 64-year-old post-AMI Kaunas population had a tendency to decrease during last period, while among 25–54 years old persons long-term survival was without significant changes. The results highlight the fact that AMI survivors, especially in youngest age, remain a high-risk group and reinforce the importance of primary and secondary prevention for the improvement of long-term prognosis of AMI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radišauskas et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction. Time period of AMI (1996 to 2012) was evaluated on 36-month survival (p=0.081). Among adults aged 25-64 with acute myocardial infarction, overall 36-month survival did not significantly differ across the 1996, 2003-2004, 2008, and 2012 time periods (p=0.081).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: