This paper suggests that it is a timely task to aim at building better methods in economic geography. While economic geography is a vibrant field, it is characterized by methodological divides and fragmentations. In presenting a collection of five papers, we address these problems by suggesting to move forward in at least five directions: bridging the qualitative/quantitative divide, clarifying causality, selecting appropriate data, improving rigor, and ensuring high ethical standards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bathelt et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: