Key result
The Moving On! transition program significantly improved student-athletes' nutrition self-efficacy (Hedges' g 0.70, p=0.007) and healthy eater identity (p=0.026), though it did not significantly change exercise identity or autonomous motivation.
Why the study?
Former student-athletes face challenges maintaining physical activity and healthy eating after transitioning out of college sports, which can lead to negative physical and psychosocial outcomes.
Observational (n=20)
Yes
The Moving On! transition program improved nutrition-related self-perceptions and self-efficacy among collegiate student-athletes, though it did not significantly change exercise identity or autonomous motivation.
May support nutrition education in athlete transitions; leaves open effects on exercise identity and motivation.
Former student-athletes may face challenges in maintaining physical activity and engaging in healthy eating after transitioning out of collegiate athletics. Maladaptive adjustments following athletic transitions can result in detrimental outcomes for former student-athletes, ranging from physical health concerns to negative psychosocial consequences. In contrast, positive transitions can promote optimal health and wellbeing. The Moving On! program was developed in recognition of the unique challenges faced by student-athletes and the importance of making healthy transitions out of college sports. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Moving On! program’s influence on several relevant theoretical constructs that influence health behaviors, including student-athletes’ self-perceptions and self-determined motivation for maintaining physical activity and healthy eating, along with their self-efficacy and intentions for engaging in these health-related behaviors after college. NCAA student-athletes in their final year of competition were recruited from two institutions. Participants (N = 20) completed the Moving On! program along with pre- and post-test surveys and focus group interviews. Survey results revealed positive changes in nutrition-related self-perceptions (t(19) = 2.406; p = 0.026; g = 0.38) and self-efficacy for healthy eating behaviors (t(19) = 3.022; p = 0.007; g = 0.70). No significant changes were observed for exercise identity (p = 0.845), physical activity self-efficacy (p = 0.114), or autonomous motivation for exercise (p = 0.108) and health eating (p = 0.264). Focus group responses indicated that student-athletes’ experiences in the program fostered positive shifts in their self-perceptions, enhanced their self-determined motivation, and reinforced their intentions for engaging in physical activity and healthy eating in the future. Implications for future research and program implementation are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reifsteck et al. (2018) conducted an observational in NCAA student-athletes transitioning out of college sports (n=20). Moving On! transition program vs. Pre-intervention baseline was evaluated on Nutrition self-efficacy (Hedges' g 0.70, p=0.007). The Moving On! transition program significantly improved student-athletes' nutrition self-efficacy (Hedges' g 0.70, p=0.007) and healthy eater identity (p=0.026), though it did not significantly change exercise identity or autonomous motivation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: