We only have this paper's title and publication details.
Read it at the sourceAnswers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Treatment decisions are based not only on the best available evidence but also on the patient's goals of care and preferences. Patients should be referred to trusted material to aid in their understanding and awareness of the consequences and risks of any proposed action.”
“We're the first guideline [in this area] that talks about the fact that you can remove or withdraw pacemaker therapy and that that would not be considered assisted suicide.... Including the patient and their family in all discussions about whether to implant the device or whether to withdraw therapy is really critical, because unfortunately we doctors have not been that good about that in the past.”
“Identifying patient populations who will benefit the most from emerging pacing technologies, such as His bundle pacing and transcatheter leadless pacing systems, will require further investigation as these modalities are incorporated into clinical practice. Regardless of technology, for the foreseeable future, pacing therapy requires implantation of a medical device, and future studies are warranted to focus on the long-term implications associated with lifelong therapy.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kusumoto et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: