Background Previous research has indicated that the sex, status, and non-verbal behaviors of experimenters or clinicians can contribute to reported pain, and placebo and nocebo effects in patients or research participants. However, no systematic review has been published. Objective: To investigate the effects of experimenter/clinician characteristics and non-verbal behavior on pain, placebo, and nocebo effects. Methods: Using EmBase, Web of Knowledge, and PubMed databases, several literature searches were conducted to find studies that investigated the effects of the experimenter’s/clinician’s sex, status and non-verbal behaviors on pain, placebo, and nocebo effects. Results: Thirty-four studies were included, twenty on the effects of characteristics of the experimenter/clinician, eleven on the role of non-verbal behaviors, and three on the effects of both non-verbal behaviors and characteristics of experimenters/clinicians on pain and placebo/nocebo effects. Experimenters/clinicians induced lower pain report in participants of the opposite sex. Furthermore, higher confidence, competence, and professionalism of experimenters/clinicians resulted in lower pain report and higher placebo effects, whereas lower status of experimenters/clinicians such as lower confidence, competence, and professionalism generated higher reported pain and lower placebo effects. Positive non-verbal behaviors (e.g. smiling, strong tone of voice, more eye contact, more leaning toward the patient/participant, and more body gestures) contributed to lower reported pain and higher placebo effects, whereas negative non-verbal behaviors (i.e. no smile, monotonous tone of voice, no eye contact, leaning backward from the participant/patient, and no body gestures) contributed to higher reported pain and nocebo effects. Conclusion: Characteristics and non-verbal behaviors of experimenters/clinicians contribute to the elicitation and modulation of pain, placebo and nocebo effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniali et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: