Key result
COVID-19 pandemic linked to lower NSTEMI admissions and PCI volumes with no change in mortality.
Why the study?
Previous studies reported mixed findings regarding the effects of COVID-19 on AMI and PCI procedural volumes, case fatalities, and STEMI door-to-balloon times.
Does the COVID-19 pandemic reduce AMI and PCI volumes or worsen mortality outcomes in patients in South East Asia and the Middle East?
Observational (n=24,538)
Yes
Does the COVID-19 pandemic reduce AMI and PCI volumes or worsen mortality outcomes in patients in South East Asia and the Middle East?
The COVID-19 pandemic led to a reduction in NSTEMI and PCI volumes in some regions, but did not adversely affect in-hospital mortality or STEMI door-to-balloon times.
Background: Previous studies have reported mixed findings regarding the effects of COVID-19 on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and acute MI (AMI) procedural volumes and case fatalities, as well as on ST-elevation MI (STEMI) door-to-balloon time (DTB). This study characterised the effects of COVID-19 on AMI and PCI volumes and mortality outcomes in countries from Asia and the Middle East, which faced repeated waves of COVID-19. Methods: Pooled data on AMI and PCI case volumes were collected in 4-weekly blocks from Malaysia, Singapore and Abu Dhabi from 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 2020 (during COVID-19). These were compared against reported COVID-19 case numbers. Case fatality rates, STEMI patient demographics and STEMI DTB times were compared between the pre- and during COVID-19 periods. Results: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a comparative reduction in non-STEMI (NSTEMI) cases in Singapore (from 814 to 722; p=0.025) and Malaysia (from 925 to 604; p<0.001), but not in Abu Dhabi (from 144 to 188; p=0.010). PCI volumes fell significantly in Singapore (from 13,089 to 11,449; p=0.020), but not in Malaysia or Abu Dhabi. STEMI volume remained similar before and during COVID-19. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality for NSTEMI, STEMI or PCI between the two periods. Conclusion: COVID-19 resulted in a fall in NSTEMI and PCI cases, potentially as a result of patients deferring contact with healthcare institutions. With appropriate protocols and systems, it is possible to provide coronary intervention services in the middle of a pandemic without compromising on mortality or DTB outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tern et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=24,538). COVID-19 pandemic period (2020) vs. Pre-COVID-19 period (2019) was evaluated on In-hospital case fatality rate for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (RR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-1.1, p=0.480). The COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced NSTEMI admissions (1,514 vs 1,883; p<0.001) and PCI volumes (11,449 vs 13,089; p=0.020) without affecting PCI in-hospital mortality (RR 0.9, p=0.480).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: