Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of free-atom-to-metal Auger-parameter shifts to determine atomic-potential parameters for Na, Mg, and Zn is shown to lead to an apparent inconsistency between the effects of perfect screening and the influence of valence-wave-function compression in the metallic state. This conflict is traced to the neglect in standard potential models of the quadratic dependence of the atomic-core potential on valence charge. We propose a generalized model which gives a good description of the atomic-core potential, and show that this can be used to derive empirical solid-state potential parameters from metal-atom Auger-parameter shifts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cole et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: