This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Mangrove soils can act as long-term carbon sinks, yet carbon sequestration rates remain poorly quantified in many semi-arid and urban-influenced regions, including northeast Brazil. This study estimated soil carbon sequestration rates in upper and lower fringing mangroves across three estuarine systems in the Fortaleza metropolitan region: Rio Ceará, Rio Cocó and Rio Pacoti. Sediment cores were analysed for organic matter, particle size, dry bulk density and ²¹⁰Pb-derived geochronologies to estimate sediment accretion and carbon sequestration over recent decades. Mean carbon sequestration rates varied strongly among estuaries and mangrove positions, with values of 220 and 202 g m⁻² yr⁻¹ in Rio Ceará lower and upper mangroves, 3248 and 592 g m⁻² yr⁻¹ in Rio Cocó lower and upper mangroves, and 890 and 1553 g m⁻² yr⁻¹ in Rio Pacoti lower and upper mangroves, respectively. The mean rate recorded in the Rio Cocó lower mangrove was approximately 14 times higher than the global mean estimate of 226 g m⁻² yr⁻¹ reported by Hopkinson et al. (2012). Elevated rates in Rio Cocó and Rio Pacoti are consistent with external organic matter inputs, including urban-derived material, catchment and aquaculture inputs, and aeolian material from adjacent dune and Caatinga systems, although direct source apportionment was not undertaken. These findings highlight the importance of semi-arid Brazilian mangroves within blue-carbon assessments and indicate that effective conservation should consider mangrove extent, sediment processes, water quality, hydrological connectivity and pressures from urban and coastal development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ward et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: