OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between viral load suppression and baseline viral load as well as that between viral load suppression and baseline CD4(+) cell count. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of published and presented studies. METHODS: Trials of two nucleoside analogs plus nevirapine, indinavir, nelfinavir, or efavirenz as therapy for antiretroviral treatment-naive patients with HIV infection or AIDS who were followed-up for at least 6 months were included in the meta-analysis. The proportion of patients with viral loads of <200-500 copies/ml at 6 and 12 months (total number of patients, 1619 and 761, respectively) was regressed to the mean or median baseline viral load and CD4(+) cell count. RESULTS: Thirty-six treatment arms from 30 studies were identified. Multivariate regression demonstrated a significant correlation between baseline CD4(+) cell count and virologic suppression at 6 and 12 months ( t = 2.85, p =.008; and t = 3.08, p =.010, respectively) but not between baseline viral load and virologic suppression ( t = 0.92, p =.365; and t = 1.31, p =.215, respectively). The same pattern was seen in a subanalysis of trials of nevirapine-containing therapy (CD4(+) cell count: t = 2.89, p =.014 at 6 months; viral load suppression: t = 0.84, p =.415). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline CD4(+) cell count was a better predictor of virologic suppression induced by triple combination therapy than was baseline viral load.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skowron et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: