Cable force estimation is critical for ensuring the structural health of cable-stayed bridges. This study assesses the accuracy of three vibration-based models – classical string theory, a least-squares beam formulation, and a two-mode beam combination – using lift-off test results as ground-truth validation. Field measurements were analysed to extract natural frequencies, which served as inputs to predict axial forces. The correlation between estimated forces and lift-off measurements was evaluated using the Pearson coefficient and mean absolute error (MAE). Results show strong agreement between vibration-based estimates and lift-off forces, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.8610 to 0.8619. Beam-theory approaches outperformed the string model, achieving 7–8% lower MAE confirming that incorporating bending stiffness and multi-mode effects improves accuracy. However, small numerical differences suggest axial tension remains the dominant factor, with flexural rigidity having minor influence on long and slender cables. The near-perfect correlation between the beam-based models (r > 0.9996) highlights their internal consistency. Overall, these findings demonstrate that vibration-based models are reliable tools providing essential insights for structural health monitoring and maintenance strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Syamsi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: