Key result
Self-administered high-intensity interval training guided by a smartphone app yielded similar improvements in VO2max (3.7 vs 3.6 mL/kg/min) and quality of life compared to supervised training.
Why the study?
Supervised HIIT counteracts reduced VO2max and poor cardiovascular health in inflammatory rheumatic diseases, but it is resource demanding.
Does self-administered smartphone-guided HIIT improve VO2max and HRQoL similarly to supervised HIIT in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases?
RCT (n=40)
randomized
Does self-administered smartphone-guided HIIT improve VO2max and HRQoL similarly to supervised HIIT in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases?
Smartphone-guided self-administered HIIT is as effective as supervised HIIT in improving VO2max and HRQoL in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, offering a less resource-demanding alternative.
BACKGROUND Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) experience disease-related barriers to physical training. Compared with the general population, IRD patients are reported to have reduced maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and physical activity levels. Supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is documented to counteract the reduced VO2max and poor cardiovascular health associated with IRDs. However, supervised HIIT is resource demanding. OBJECTIVE This study sought to investigate if self-administered 4×4-min HIIT guided by a smartphone app (Myworkout GO) could yield similar HIIT-induced effects as standard 4×4-min HIIT performed under the guidance and supervision of health care professionals. The effects studied were on VO2max and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS Forty patients (33 female patients, mean age 48 years, SD 12 years; 7 male patients, mean age 52 years, SD 11 years) diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus were randomized to a supervised group (SG) or an app group (AG). Both groups were instructed to perform 4×4-min intervals with a rate of perceived exertion of 16 to 17, corresponding to 85% to 95% of the maximal heart rate, twice a week for 10 weeks. Treadmill VO2max and HRQoL measured using RAND-36 were assessed before and after the exercise period. RESULTS VO2max increased (P<.001) in both groups after 10 weeks of HIIT, with improvements of 3.6 (SD 1.3) mL/kg/min in the SG and 3.7 (SD 1.5) mL/kg/min in the AG. This was accompanied by increases in oxygen pulse in both groups (P<.001), with no between-group differences apparent for either measure. Improvements in the HRQoL dimensions of bodily pain, vitality, and social functioning were observed for both groups (P<.001 to P=.04). Again, no between-group differences were detected. CONCLUSIONS High-intensity 4×4-min interval training increased VO2max and HRQoL, contributing to patients’ reduced cardiovascular disease risk, improved health and performance, and enhanced quality of life. Similar improvements were observed following HIIT when IRD patients were guided using perceived exertion by health care professionals or the training was self-administered and guided by the app Myworkout GO. Utilization of the app may help reduce the cost of HIIT as a treatment strategy in this patient population. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04649528; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04649528
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haglo et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Inflammatory rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus) (n=40). Self-administered 4x4-min HIIT guided by a smartphone app (Myworkout GO) vs. Standard 4x4-min HIIT performed under the guidance and supervision of health care professionals was evaluated on Treadmill VO2max (p=<.001). Self-administered high-intensity interval training guided by a smartphone app yielded similar improvements in VO2max (3.7 vs 3.6 mL/kg/min) and quality of life compared to supervised training.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: