Key result
Elderly stroke patients and controls frequently consider painless death preferable to severe or any disability.
Case-Control (n=56)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: To determine how elderly stroke patients perceive different stroke outcomes, including death, relative to each other and how these views compare with those of age/sex-matched controls. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Twenty-eight elderly patients discharged from hospital with an acute stroke causing hemiplegia. Twenty-eight age/sex-matched control patients from the same hospital who had never had a stroke or transient ischaemic attack. METHODS: Patients and controls were asked to rank 11 clinical scenarios of potential stroke outcomes, from the most to the least desirable outcome. RESULTS: There was a striking bimodal distribution for sudden painless death in both groups. Painless death was preferred to even a minor stroke disability in over one-third of elderly individuals, whilst 20% would prefer severe disability rather than painless death. Sixty-nine per cent of stroke patients and 82% of controls ranked death as preferable to severe disability. Stroke patients may be more tolerant of disability (compared to death) than their controls (39% patients and 61% controls preferred death to any disability, p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that many elderly individuals would rather die than be alive and severely disabled. This may have important implications for acute stroke treatments such as thrombolysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanger et al. (2000) conducted a case-control in Acute stroke causing hemiplegia (n=56). Acute stroke causing hemiplegia vs. Age/sex-matched controls without prior stroke or transient ischaemic attack was evaluated on Preference of death over any disability in ranked stroke outcome scenarios (p=0.11). Elderly stroke patients and matched controls frequently ranked painless death as preferable to severe disability (69% vs 82%) and to any disability (39% vs 61%, p=0.11).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: