Key result
A peer evaluation tool implemented for perioperative registered nurses' annual performance reviews was considered useful and fair by both staff members and managers.
Implementation of a peer evaluation system for perioperative nurses was found to be useful and fair by staff and management.
May support peer evaluation in perioperative nursing reviews; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE evaluations can be difficult to prepare and may rely, in part, on anecdotal information. PERIOPERATIVE RNs at CHRISTUS St Patrick Hospital, Lake Charles, La, developed and implemented a peer evaluation as part of nurses' annual performance evaluations. THE EVALUATION FORMS created were considered to be useful and fair by both staff members and managers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melanie B. Gentry (2006) studied this question. A peer evaluation tool implemented for perioperative registered nurses' annual performance reviews was considered useful and fair by both staff members and managers.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: