Why the study?
Does the Clinical Anesthesia System of Evaluation (CASE) method improve the evaluation of clinical performance and critical incidents in anaesthesia residents?
Does the Clinical Anesthesia System of Evaluation (CASE) method improve the evaluation of clinical performance and critical incidents in anaesthesia residents?
The CASE method improves the validity and dimensions of evaluating anaesthesia residents' clinical performance.
May support CASE adoption for anesthesia resident assessment; leaves open need for prospective validation.
We have found that the Clinical Anesthesia System of Evaluation (CASE) method provides information regarding clinical performance of residents and critical incidents that is not available from other sources. As a result, it expands the dimensions of the evaluation process and improves validity. In addition, the technique has helped address the concerns of many investigators. (1) It provides specific, real-time evaluations that permit early intervention, improve feedback and guide remediation; (2) it improves sampling techniques by increasing the breadth and volume of evaluators and settings; (3) it enhances the discriminatory power of the evaluation process; and (4) it improves documentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. F. Rhoton (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: