The drug metaphor suggests that if a process component (e.g., interpretation) is an active ingredient of a successful psychotherapy, then administering a relatively high level of it should yield a relatively positive outcome, and levels of the process component and the outcome should be correlated across clients. Measures of 5 theoretically relevant, reliably measured verbal process components were compared with the rate of change in 3 standard symptom intensity measures across the brief treatments of 39 (mainly depressed) psychotherapy clients. The expected significant process-outcome correlations were not found. These results are discussed as they illuminate some misleading assumptions that underlie many conventional studies of psychotherapy process and outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stiles et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: