Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this work, a comprehensive study of fluid forces and thermal analysis of two-dimensional, laminar, and incompressible complex (power law, Bingham, and Herschel–Bulkley) fluid flow over a topological cross-sectional cylinder (square, hexagon, and circle) in channel have been computationally done by using finite element technique. The characteristics of nonlinear flow for varying ranges of power law index <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|"> <a:mrow> <a:mn>0.4</a:mn> <a:mo>≤</a:mo> <a:mi>n</a:mi> <a:mo>≤</a:mo> <a:mn>1.6</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:mfenced> <a:mo>,</a:mo> </a:math> Bingham number <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <f:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|"> <f:mrow> <f:mn>0</f:mn> <f:mo>≤</f:mo> <f:mtext>Bn</f:mtext> <f:mo>≤</f:mo> <f:mn>50</f:mn> </f:mrow> </f:mfenced> </f:math> , Prandtl number <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <k:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|"> <k:mrow> <k:mn>0.7</k:mn> <k:mo>≤</k:mo> <k:mtext>Pr</k:mtext> <k:mo>≤</k:mo> <k:mn>10</k:mn> </k:mrow> </k:mfenced> </k:math> , Reynolds number <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <p:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|"> <p:mrow> <p:mn>10</p:mn> <p:mo>≤</p:mo> <p:mtext>Re</p:mtext> <p:mo>≤</p:mo> <p:mn>50</p:mn> </p:mrow> </p:mfenced> </p:math> , and Grashof number <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <u:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|"> <u:mrow> <u:mn>1</u:mn> <u:mo>≤</u:mo> <u:mtext>Gr</u:mtext> <u:mo>≤</u:mo> <u:mn>10</u:mn> </u:mrow> </u:mfenced> <u:mo> </u:mo> </u:math> have been examined. Considerable evaluation for thermal flow field in the form of dimensionless velocity profile, isotherms, drag and lift coefficients, and average Nusselt number <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <z:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|"> <z:mrow> <z:msub> <z:mrow> <z:mtext>Nu</z:mtext> </z:mrow> <z:mrow> <z:mtext>avg</z:mtext> </z:mrow> </z:msub> </z:mrow> </z:mfenced> </z:math> is done. Also, for a range of <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7"> <eb:mtext>Bn</eb:mtext> </eb:math> , the drag forces reduction is observed for circular and hexagonal obstacles in comparison with the square cylinder. At <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M8"> <gb:mtext>Bn</gb:mtext> <gb:mo>=</gb:mo> <gb:mn>0</gb:mn> <gb:mo> </gb:mo> </gb:math> corresponding to Newtonian fluid, maximum reduction in drag force is reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majeed et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: