Key result
Evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding the ability of continuous positive airway pressure to improve arterial stiffness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea remains conflicting.
Why the study?
Randomized controlled trials have provided equivocal data that obstructive sleep apnoea treatment improves cardiovascular outcomes, leaving it debated whether treatment improves arterial stiffness.
Does continuous positive airway pressure (c-PAP) improve arterial stiffness measured as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea?
Does continuous positive airway pressure (c-PAP) improve arterial stiffness measured as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea?
Evidence from RCTs on whether c-PAP improves arterial stiffness in OSA is conflicting, with potential benefits observed primarily in severe OSA with higher baseline stiffness.
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is a breathing disorder characterized by narrowing of the upper airway that impairs normal ventilation during sleep. OSA is a highly prevalent condition which is associated with several Cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and CV diseases. Despite this clear association, Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) have provided equivocal data that treatment of sleep apnoea can improve CV outcomes regardless of its ability to reduce blood pressure. Here, we critically review the evidence that supports role of OSA as a risk factor for increased arterial stiffness which represents an early manifestation of vascular damage often preceding major CV events. Additionally, we examined evidence from interventional RCTs to assess if treatment of OSA by continuous positive airway pressure can affect arterial stiffness measured as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Overall, a large body of evidence supports the role of OSA as a risk factor for increased arterial stiffness and several pathophysiological mechanisms, including activation of the autonomic nervous system, may help to explain the link between breathing disorders and vascular alterations (here mainly examined as functional properties). Whether the causal relationship between OSA and vascular damage exists or is mostly explained by confounders and whether OSA treatment can improve vascular stiffening is still debated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcon et al. (2020) conducted a review in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (c-PAP) vs. Sham c-PAP or no treatment was evaluated on Change in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). Evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding the ability of continuous positive airway pressure to improve arterial stiffness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea remains conflicting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: