Signed‐likelihood ratio tests (SLRTs) are derived for testing the shape and scale parameters and the mean of a gamma distribution. The properties of the proposed tests are evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation and compared with the other tests available in the literature. SLRTs are also developed for two‐sample problems of comparing two shape parameters, two scale parameters and two means, and their merits are evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation. Evaluation studies indicate that the SLRTs are accurate even for small samples and are comparable with or better than other tests. Furthermore, simple parametric bootstrap (PB) methods based on the maximum likelihood estimates are proposed for interval estimation. The PB confidence intervals are satisfactory even for small samples. The methods are illustrated and compared using two examples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnamoorthy et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: