Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: Previous studies have shown that the performance of the famous face P300-speller was better than that of the classical row/column flashing P300-speller. Furthermore, in some studies, the brain was more active when responding to one’s own face than to a famous face, and a self-face stimulus elicited larger amplitude event-related potentials (ERPs) than did a famous face. Thus, we study the self-face paradigm on further improving the performance of P300-speller system and take the famous face P300-speller paradigm as the control paradigm. Methods: We designed two facial P300-speller paradigms based on the self-face and a famous face (Ming Yao, a sports star; the famous face spelling paradigm) with a neutral expression. Results: ERP amplitudes were significantly greater in the self-face than in the famous face spelling paradigm at the parietal area from 340 ms to 480 ms (P300), from 480 ms to 600 ms (P600f), and at the fronto-central area from 700 ms to 800 ms. Offline and online classification results showed that the self-face spelling paradigm accuracies were significantly higher than those of the famous face spelling paradigm at superposing first two times (P < 0.05). Similar results were found for information transfer rates (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The self-face spelling paradigm significantly improved the performance of the P300-speller system. This has significant practical applications for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) and could avoid infringement issues caused by using images of other people’s faces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: