Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of integrating motor imagery (MI) practice into traditional teaching methods on the motor imagery skills and motor learning performance of physiotherapy students. Methods: Twenty-four students were randomly assigned to two groups: the Motor Imagery Group (MIG; 21.15 ± 1.46 years) and the Control Group (CG; 21.91 ± 1.58 years). Both groups initially received traditional instruction on infantile colic massage. Following a familiarization session, the MIG additionally engaged in MI practice twice a week for two weeks. Outcome measures included the Motor Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3) and mental chronometry tests. At the end of the intervention, qualitative feedback regarding the learning experience was also obtained from the MIG participants. Results: Baseline values did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05) except for the MIQ-3 Kinesthetic score (p = 0.003). Within-group analysis revealed a significant improvement in the MIG’s MIQ-3 Kinesthetic score from pre- to post-assessment (p = 0.003), while other parameters remained unchanged. Mental chronometry results showed a significant reduction in real-time performance duration in the MIG (p = 0.025). Qualitative findings indicated that most participants perceived MI as a useful and motivating strategy for enhancing self-learning and memory retention. Conclusion: Incorporating MI practice into traditional teaching improved students’ kinesthetic imagery ability and performance efficiency in learning infantile colic massage. MI may serve as an effective, low-cost, and student-centered pedagogical tool to support psychomotor skill acquisition in physiotherapy and rehabilitation education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Topcu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: