Background Infliximab and adalimumab are effective anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies for the treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease (CD). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab in a real-world cohort of children with CD. Methods Data from biological-naïve children with luminal CD (age 3-18 years) who commenced anti-TNF and completed at least 1 year of follow-up were collected from the prospective multicenter observational PIBD-SETQuality study. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR), defined as clinical remission (weighted pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index [wPCDAI] <12.5) without systemic steroids or luminal surgery at 1 year. The relative risk (RR) of SFCR was calculated using standardization, correcting for the following baseline covariates: age, upfront anti-TNF, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, albumin, leukocytes, disease behavior, wPCDAI, perianal disease, and concomitant immunomodulator use. Secondary outcomes included the durability of anti-TNF treatment without luminal surgery. Results Between January 1, 2017, and June 14, 2024, 178 patients with anti-TNF were included (infliximab: n = 121 [68%], adalimumab: n = 57 [32%]). At 12 months, 34/56 (61%) patients treated with adalimumab and 66/120 (55%) patients treated with infliximab had reached SFCR. The RR of SFCR at 1 year with adalimumab compared to infliximab was 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-1.66], P = .13. Adalimumab was associated with a significant lower adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of treatment discontinuation than infliximab in patients with a concomitant immunomodulator (aHR 0.17 [95% CI 0.04-0.75], P = .020), adjusted for upfront anti-TNF. Conclusions In this prospective cohort of children with CD, adalimumab and infliximab showed comparable clinical effectiveness 1 year after the start of anti-TNF treatment. Clinical trial registration The ClincalTrials.gov ID of this study is NCT03571373.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vuijk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: