Why the study?
Gefapixant is being investigated for refractory or unexplained chronic cough, but its disposition in humans needed to be assessed.
What are the absorption, metabolism, and excretion profiles of a single oral dose of gefapixant in healthy adult males?
What are the absorption, metabolism, and excretion profiles of a single oral dose of gefapixant in healthy adult males?
Gefapixant is well absorbed orally and eliminated primarily unchanged via renal excretion, establishing its pharmacokinetic profile in humans.
Human ADME data confirm predominant renal elimination of gefapixant; extends nonclinical findings but leaves dosing implications open pending trials.
Gefapixant (MK‐7264) is a first‐in‐class, selective antagonist of the P2X3 purinergic receptor currently being investigated as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough. In non‐clinical studies, gefapixant was eliminated primarily by renal excretion of the parent drug. The objective of this study was to assess the disposition of gefapixant in humans. The absorption, metabolism, and excretion profiles of gefapixant were assessed after oral administration of a single dose of [ 14 C]gefapixant to six healthy adult males. Following a single‐oral [ 14 C]gefapixant dose to healthy adult males, the mass balance was achieved, with 98.9% of the administered radioactivity recovered in urine and feces. Elimination of gefapixant occurred primarily via renal excretion of the intact drug (64%); metabolism was a minor pathway of elimination of gefapixant (12% and 2% recovered in urine and feces, respectively). Single‐dose administration of [ 14 C]gefapixant 50 mg was generally well tolerated in healthy adult males. The fraction of the anticipated therapeutic oral dose of gefapixant absorbed is estimated to be at least 78%. Gefapixant is expected to be the major circulating drug‐related material in plasma, and the majority of the dosed drug will be excreted unchanged in urine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nussbaum et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: