Florence Le Hebela*, Andrée Tiberghienb, Pascale Montpiedb & Valérie Fontanieuca University of Lyon1, ICAR UMR 5191, LLE, UMS 3773, ENS Lyon, Franceb CNRS, Université Lyon 2, ENS-Lyon, Lyon, Francec IFE, ENS-Lyon, Lyon, France CONTACT Florence Le Hebel florence.le-hebel@ens-lyon.fr CNRS, Université Lyon 2, ENS-Lyon, 15 Parvis René Descartes, BP 700, LLE UMS 3773, Lyon 69342, France ABSTRACTThis study focuses on the teachers’ predictions of the students’ performances – in particular the middle-low achievers – while solving tasks testing inquiry competencies. The tasks come from PISA science. More specifically we study science teachers’ predictions for several aspects: levels of difficulty of the tasks, the potential sources of difficulty and the potential difficulty in solving it for medium-low achievers. We also study what assessed competencies are identified by science teachers in the tasks. Our approach is a questionnaire-based study. A sample of French teachers in science and technology (125) responded to the questionnaire. The teachers show a rather good ability to predict inquiry task levels of difficulty for medium-low achievers and are able to identify relevant potential sources of difficulty or easiness in the items. However, they are not aware of some essential difficulties that medium-low students encounter while solving science inquiry tasks. Moreover, the teachers have difficulty identifying the competencies that are tested by an item.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hébel et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: