Why the study?
Does phylogenetic analysis with complete VP4 genes improve identification of enterovirus serotypes compared to neutralization tests?
Does phylogenetic analysis with complete VP4 genes improve identification of enterovirus serotypes compared to neutralization tests?
Phylogenetic analysis with complete VP4 genes is more useful than standard neutralization tests for identifying enterovirus serotypes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phylogenetic analysis may aid enterovirus identification when neutralization fails; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
We isolated six viruses from patients diagnosed with aseptic meningitis or hand, foot, and mouth disease. The cytopathic effect of these viruses on cultured cells was like that of enteroviruses. However, viral neutralization tests against standard antisera were negative. Phylogenetic analysis with the complete VP4 nucleotide sequences of these 6 viruses and 29 serotypes of enteroviruses classified 3 of the viruses as serotype echovirus type 18 (EV18) and 3 as serotype human enterovirus 71 (HEV71). These results were confirmed by remicroneutralization tests with HEV-monospecific antisera or an additional phylogenetic analysis with the complete VP4 nucleotide sequences. Phylogenetic analysis with complete VP4 genes is more useful than neutralization tests with enterovirus serotype-specific antisera in identifying enterovirus serotypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kubo et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: