We have outlined here a proposed approach to research on legal issues involving theory testing via laboratory research, then theory development to account for the failure of predictions, then new research to test the new or revised theory. It is our belief that such an approach would supply much that is lacking in the “raw empiricist” research style that is too often seen in legal studies. By supplying more accurate, well-tested theories of legal behavior, this approach can contribute to the engineering of more effective, more efficient, and fairer legal procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lind et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: